Interesting, though slightly ambivalent, Reuters blog yesterday on
Muhammad Yunus and Grameen America by financial journalist Felix Salmon, who interviewed Muhammad Yunus earlier this week.
Seems that Muhammad Yunus had something critical to say about Kiva.
. . .
When the conversation came around to Kiva, for instance, Yunus told me that he found the emphasis on very poor borrowers to be “undignified”.
If you go to the Kiva website, said Yunus, you see an individual whose poverty is being used to gin up donations. Which doesn’t dignify her. “After all, she’s paying interest. Why should you advertise her as someone who’s deserving of donations? It’s an undignified way of doing it. She’s running a business. Respect her as a client. As somebody who’s paying full cost.”
. . .
Not really sure what the point is there, or of course whether it's been conveyed accurately. Kiva borrowers aren't put forward as "deserving of donations", and Kiva does make it very clear that borrowers do pay interest on what is a loan, not a donation. Since Grameen America is
a Kiva field partner, the message seems confused to say the least.
Peter