jaclynsorenson
Kiva Supporter

Posts: 1
|
 |
« on: February 17, 2008, 01:43:40 PM » |
|
Hello, which third party (if any) allows for interest free loans? I would like to participate, however, I do not want to earn interest, and I don't want the receiver to be charged interest....
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KivanSteven
|
 |
« Reply To This #2 on: February 24, 2008, 08:46:28 PM » |
|
Hi Jaclyn....here is a list of MFIs that charge less than a 5% interest on their loans through Kiva. TOGO - Microfund Togo 1% BULGARIA - REDC Bulgaria 1% UGANDA - Uganda Microfinance Limted 1% (Inactive) BENIN - Alide 2% HONDURAS - Adelante Foundation 3% AZERBAIJAN - Komak Credit Union 3% DOMINICAN REP - Esperanza International 4% DOMINICAN REP - Fundacion San Miguel Arcangel 4% WITEP AND SEED also charge a minimal interest but arrangements with these MFIs have been closed. Here you can find these MFI's Kiva pages: http://www.kiva.org/about/partners
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I find not direction in the readings of those with whom my eccentricities are similar, but rather validation.
My only solace is that I find a peaceful place where I might be resigned to my depriving loneliness.
|
|
|
|
Henry
|
 |
« Reply To This #3 on: February 24, 2008, 10:02:31 PM » |
|
in the past, KIVA has not been strict with these numbers. I wouldn't expect these to be accurate.
3% compounded daily could be a lot of money in interest.
1000 @ 3% monthly is 19.5% annually. (I know this is close - not 100% on target but close)
3% on balance each month
Loan paymen interest 1000 83.333 30 916.667 83.333 27.50001 833.334 83.333 25.00002 750.001 83.333 22.50003 666.668 83.333 20.00004 583.335 83.333 17.50005 500.002 83.333 15.00006 416.669 83.333 12.50007 333.336 83.333 10.00008 250.003 83.333 7.50009 166.67 83.333 5.0001 83.337 83.333 2.50011
total Interest $195.008 over 12 months = 19.5 %
I wish KIVA would audit the interest numbers for EVERY MFI
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 24, 2008, 10:03:03 PM by Henry »
|
Logged
|
ornitzi bilatzi monteisizi
|
|
|
|
KivanSteven
|
 |
« Reply To This #4 on: February 24, 2008, 10:16:04 PM » |
|
thats a good point Henry, unfortunately we have no way of knowing if or when these are supposed to have been changed and updated and its all we really have to go on--if they are inaccurate though I guess we could say that the %s they provide are as good as having no info on %s at all. Has anyone ever noticed if in fact Kiva has ever changed any of the interest rate %s?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I find not direction in the readings of those with whom my eccentricities are similar, but rather validation.
My only solace is that I find a peaceful place where I might be resigned to my depriving loneliness.
|
|
|
|
AccountAbility
|
 |
« Reply To This #5 on: February 25, 2008, 12:01:54 PM » |
|
Hello, which third party (if any) allows for interest free loans? I would like to participate, however, I do not want to earn interest, and I don't want the receiver to be charged interest.... Thanks!
Lets go back to the original issue. Micro loans are not charity. They are designed to be honest transactions between a borrow and a self sustaining lending agency. That they are not a hand-out gives the borrower dignity and self confidence. No matter how you cut it, it costs money to lend and the lender should recoup its costs in order for this to be a legitimate transaction. On small short loans the costs (when expressed as an interest rate) seem high, although the actual amount remains very small. There are many different ways that interest rates are expressed, and many of the Field Partners use differing methods, thus the confusion about rates. I would like to see the loan interest expressed in the actual amount, not some esoteric rate calculation which is open to interpretation. Dan
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We are loaners!
|
|
|
waywardcats
Kiva Supporter
SF Bay Area
    
Gender: 
Posts: 1947
Xania, Crete
|
 |
« Reply To This #6 on: May 07, 2008, 11:02:56 AM » |
|
Hi jaclynsorenson,
I am also new. As I understand it, as a lender you do not earn any interest on your loans. You are providing the principal only. I hope you take some time to look at the other replies and feel better about your part in helping through Kiva.
Waywardcats
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Our daughters can contribute just as much to society as our sons, and our common prosperity will be advanced by allowing all humanity - men and women - to reach their full potential. I do not believe that women must make the same choices as men in order to be equal, and I respect those women who choose to live their lives in traditional roles. But it should be their choice. That is why the United States will partner with any Muslim-majority country to support expanded literacy for girls, and to help young women pursue employment through micro-financing that helps people live their dreams." - President Barack Obama, June 4, 2009
|
|
|
|
cpbailey
|
 |
« Reply To This #7 on: May 07, 2008, 12:42:16 PM » |
|
Whatever happened to APR, annual percentage rate? I prefer this as it takes into account compounding interest effect and how long the client has use of the money. If a client pays $50 for the privilege of using $1000, it is 5% if they have the entire amount for a year. If it is for a day, it is outrageous. Sometimes clients repay every week, and that reduces how long they have the money compared to monthly.
Also, if the client pays the loan early, this amount will change to a lower sum in reality. If the loan is detained (say in Kenya), the amount of interest will be increased. Even though the interest rate or APR remains constant in calculating things.
Reminder, SEED and WITEP may not have charged much interest, but neither have they returned principle to Kiva on a regular basis. Look at the credit risk of the organization as well.
Colette
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
AccountAbility
|
 |
« Reply To This #8 on: May 15, 2008, 12:22:01 PM » |
|
I would agree that standardized APR (Annualized Percentage Rate) makes for accurate comparisons. Unfortunately, its complexities are not simple to understand--and more importantly it is not easy to predict actual interest.
Since micro-loans need to be simple for them to be "transparent" to the borrower, MFIs will often come up with a formula which meets the criteria of simple, but does not equate to the APR methodology. In the grand scheme of things, I think it is more important that the entrepreneur borrowers understand exactly what they are getting into, even though an APR calculation might reveal a differing percentage rate than the one quoted. We may be loan shoppers by rate, but I doubt the average borrower on Kiva uses that criteria.
Dan
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We are loaners!
|
|
|
|
cpbailey
|
 |
« Reply To This #9 on: May 15, 2008, 12:33:01 PM » |
|
Dan,
I agree that things need to be explained to the borrower in terms that are comfortable and understandable. That is one aspect. On the Kiva site, it could be expressed so that we can compare APR to know which partners have lower APRs. It doesn't have to be the same thing measurement for different audiences.
Colette
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
RichardF
|
 |
« Reply To This #10 on: May 15, 2008, 12:48:46 PM » |
|
I agree with Colette. If Field Partners want to use a flat interest rate to tell borrowers how much they will pay for a loan, that's fine with me. However, Kiva should report to lenders a comparably calculated interest rate from all partners, e.g., an average APR. Who knows what we're really seeing now?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
AccountAbility
|
 |
« Reply To This #11 on: May 15, 2008, 02:05:54 PM » |
|
To be clear, I agree with both of you regarding comparative rates on Kiva (or MIX). I suspect, though, that the MFIs are simply quoting the rates they use for the borrowers.
Dan
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We are loaners!
|
|
|
|
RichardF
|
 |
« Reply To This #12 on: May 15, 2008, 02:28:12 PM » |
|
Okay, then I agree with Dan too!!! 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Soriak
|
 |
« Reply To This #13 on: May 16, 2008, 04:41:53 AM » |
|
Real transparency would probably require these three points to be noted separately:
* Fix costs for disbursing the loan * Cost of training that is provided along with the loan * interest on loan
Knowing only that an MFI charges, for example, 60% APR is not very helpful if that cost includes a course on running a business.
I'm not sure how reasonable it is to expect that level of detail though... but it would be very interesting to see.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
AccountAbility
|
 |
« Reply To This #14 on: May 16, 2008, 11:33:45 AM » |
|
Precisely.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 16, 2008, 11:34:10 AM by AccountAbility »
|
Logged
|
We are loaners!
|
|
|
|
cpbailey
|
 |
« Reply To This #15 on: May 16, 2008, 12:07:38 PM » |
|
Wow, we should all go and have a drink or something! I love it when we all can find common ground.
Kiva--do you hear? On Kiva website, a common APR is desireable. If there is a way to put a description of the training or other support that they get (value add) for that, it would be gravy and make the MFI look better for the price the borrow pays. The borrower needs to get their costs explained in terms that are locally common, honest and easily understood. Different regions will have different methods of calculating things, and different individuals will be have different levels of sophistications with money (as they do in the U.S.).
Colette
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|