Hello everyone,
I'm sorry to say this but i'm starting to think that there is a problem with Kiva's "bosses" way of thinking... why do they only see one side of the coin?

So, let me use the example posted in the blog:
If a Kiva Lender makes a $25 loan to the pig-farmer in Cambodia, but when a repayment is made, the Vietnamese Dong has devalued by 21%, TYM Fund must make up the missing 20%, but the Kiva Lender will receive back only 99% of their loan value. If the Vietnamese Dong has devalued by 30%, TYM Fund would again make up the missing 20%, but the Kiva Lender would receive only 90% of their loan value, because Kiva lenders bear the cost of the additional 10% devaluation.
If Vietnamese Dong has devalued by 30%, we bear the cost of the additional 10%!
What if the opposite happens??? What if Vietnamese Dong valutes 30%? Do we get the additional 10%? No!

You may ask me, why would you want to make money out of currency exchange? Well, i may want to invest in loans elsewhere. If Vietnamese Dong valuates 50%, i may want to redistribute the additional 30% to Bolivia, Peru or other countries. This should be a lender's decision.
The rules of the 'game' should be balanced and Kiva only sees one side of it. Please Kiva don't make the "unhappy lenders" group even bigger.
Just my $0.02,
Thanks,
Rui