|
Jill
Guest
|
 |
« on: August 28, 2007, 07:36:19 AM » |
|
A DISCUSSION of the TIMING, TYPE, CLASSIFICATION and MIX of the LOAN OPPORTUNITIES KIVA POSTS on its Site......
Thanks to Dan and Glenda...
This is an experiment in our trying to make navigating the forum a little easier.
If it seems worthwhile to people, since Joe said he has the capability of moving posts from one thread to another, (I think he said that),
maybe he can move some posts here from the Tajikistan thread, from the Fundacion para la Vivienda Progresiva thread, etc., and we can try to post in bigger, broader stroke Threads, like this one, anything related to the Kiva business postings, as framed, above.
If people don't want to do this, guess what. They don't have to!
Any alternative ideas or threads would be welcome.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Henry
|
 |
« Reply To This #1 on: August 28, 2007, 09:06:22 AM » |
|
The birds are singing the grass is growing I'm hunting KIVA Loans to fund the birds are hunting worms
I'm trying to write an extremely long post I have difficulty I'm wonderful with color- size and font it's the words that make me go 'grunt'
oh wait, let me relate! I think I just did, or tried...
KIVA Data is where I want to be So, Type, Classifications and MIX is something I hope this discussion will FIX!
Worn out now, can't seem to find the words guess it's time to spend a KIVA Credit now what Type of Loan shall it be.
(Jill, I envy parts of your magnificent brain!) EDIT: not to mention your lender page!
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 28, 2007, 09:08:39 AM by Henry »
|
Logged
|
ornitzi bilatzi monteisizi
|
|
|
|
Jill
Guest
|
 |
« Reply To This #2 on: August 28, 2007, 11:51:34 AM » |
|
Henry, Bread Crumbs!
I'll meet you over at Anything Goes.... (smiley guy).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
AccountAbility
|
 |
« Reply To This #3 on: August 28, 2007, 02:02:03 PM » |
|
A lot of the issues about this come up due to the scarcity of posted loans.
When we had 10 or 12 pages of loans, one page of home improvement loans was sort of lost in the shuffle. Likewise, loans from Azerbaijan (or other places). I suspect that there may not be a lot of options for how the MFIs post their loans other than the batch process we see now.
But when there are less than 50 or so loans in total, the disproportion just jumps out at us. And that's the very time when we want more loans on the site so a further restriction of type or country would seem counter-productive.
So if Kiva can just get the pipeline going for more loans posted at any given time, a lot of the issues here would go away. (Although then maybe we would hear more complaints about similarity of loan offerings, but I'll take that problem.)
Dan
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We are loaners!
|
|
|
|
Jill
Guest
|
 |
« Reply To This #4 on: August 28, 2007, 02:06:51 PM » |
|
It's a DAY.
I agree with you, my neighbor to the North. Yayyyyyy!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
cpbailey
|
 |
« Reply To This #5 on: August 29, 2007, 11:58:18 AM » |
|
Dan, I agree that home improvement loans are currently over-represented on Kiva. These loans are taking a VERY long time to fill. I am hoping that it is a one month thing, and the partner either improves the write-ups (making them more desirable) or is in some way restricted from having so many. This could be five home improvement loans at any time, but they get posted when another fills. At the end of the month, the unfilled home improvement loans just get pushed out another month. The following yet unfilled loan has been posted for 14 days!!! http://www.kiva.org/app.php?page=businesses&action=about&id=15509I personally feel that about 60 loans is enough to choose from yet not be overwhelming. If Asia were two or three areas, I could see a bit more. Asia seems to be Samoa, Tajikistan and Azerbaijan this month. Which is better than just Azerbaijan from recent past. Colette
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
wind5001
|
 |
« Reply To This #6 on: August 29, 2007, 12:05:58 PM » |
|
Colette,
Cambodia has been pretty well represented also, lately.
In my eyes, it's a mixed feeling: on the one hand, I want the entrepreneurs to get on the website, when they have gone through the screening process so that they can be funded quickly (and with some MFIs get the money right away), but on the other hand I would like to see a bigger diversity of countries and continents. But I guess, it won't help much, b/c when they post 15 Sierra Leone loans, they fill so quickly, that it wouldn't help if they posted only 5 every day...a dilemma!
Oli
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Robert
|
 |
« Reply To This #7 on: August 29, 2007, 01:48:24 PM » |
|
This lack of diversity can set off a newbie, and that's a problem. I don't see a problem for other lenders, as we have enough diversity in the long run. Those who need a very specific loan type can wait (cf. Mark's Fund). Those who have 1000+ loans and make 5 new loans each day, do not necessarily need to make each day 5 different loans. However, after a few months, their portfolio is well balanced.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
cpbailey
|
 |
« Reply To This #8 on: August 30, 2007, 04:59:23 PM » |
|
Robert,
I agree on the balancing the portfolio over time. That said, I just want a more interesting read. After awhile I just tune all of them out because they look the same. It is easier to look at one page of loans than to read thru two and a half of the same stuff to find something I want. (Wanted cow in Azerbaijan or embroidery in Peru or housing in Mexico...a few of each at a time, please!)
I am in replacement only mode. So I wait and wait and wait around for something I like.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
AccountAbility
|
 |
« Reply To This #9 on: August 30, 2007, 09:13:55 PM » |
|
Dan, ....I personally feel that about 60 loans is enough to choose from yet not be overwhelming. If Asia were two or three areas, I could see a bit more. Asia seems to be Samoa, Tajikistan and Azerbaijan this month. Which is better than just Azerbaijan from recent past.
Colette
I agree that 60 or so would be a nice number for a person to peruse on the Website, but only if it was a diversified offering. The current way that MFI put their loans up, (which I imagine is necessary for efficiency) puts too many of the same kind or from the same area for 60 to be sufficient. I think we should be seeing around 100 to begin to give people the feeling that there really is someone for me to engage with and therefore worth searching through the offerings. This is a marketing appeal issue. As an aside, the default sort of "popularity" which many of us (myself included) decried as not the preferred way to sort does have the unique distinction of scrambling the offerings around so that similar loans don't appear all in a row. Who'd a' thunk.  Dan
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We are loaners!
|
|
|
|